Too busy. Can't.BeaverPoke wrote:If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.
So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.
Tashaun Gipson
- McPeachy
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Has liked: 302 times
- Been liked: 119 times
Dear Karma,
I have a list of people you missed...
I have a list of people you missed...
- Wyo2dal
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:36 pm
- Location: Dome of Doom
- Been liked: 1 time
I like this idea quite a bit actually, I'll help compile the data on that I'm kind of curious as well.BeaverPoke wrote:If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.
So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.
- Asmodeanreborn
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 6929
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:16 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 23 times
Another interesting metric would be to see how many 2 and 3 star recruits made it to the NFL by playing for BCS vs non-BCS.
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
I think there are going to be a lot of players from non-power teams in power conferences (Ga.Tech, K-State, Ole Miss, Washington, etc.)Wyo2dal wrote:I like this idea quite a bit actually, I'll help compile the data on that I'm kind of curious as well.BeaverPoke wrote:If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.
So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
-
- A Real Cowboy
- Posts: 1587
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:28 pm
- Location: Nevada/Florida
- Been liked: 7 times
Here is a good site for determining NFL representation by school:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/college" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://espn.go.com/nfl/college" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What is the difference between politicians and stoners? Politicians don't inhale...they just suck.
- laxwyo
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 9488
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:27 am
- Location: Rock Springs, WY
- Has liked: 135 times
- Been liked: 142 times
I just told you the non-BCS makes up 37% if BCS makes up 50% and all other divisions make up 17%. So FBS is more important than being P5 by a long f-word shot.
W-Y, Until I Die!
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
laxwyo wrote:I just told you the non-BCS makes up 37% if BCS makes up 50% and all other divisions make up 17%. So FBS is more important than being P5 by a long f-word shot.
And that was based off the Browns preseason roster which has yet to be cut to 53.
So...the numbers aren't totally accurate.
And not to mention, the debate wasn't BCS vs everyone else.
It was BCS vs rest of FBS.
Also...37+50+17=104
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.