Look at the AFA vs. Nevada game (and stands) last Saturday. Not counting cadets, I would guess there were 2,000 there. For an AFA team that was 7 & 2 against a Nevada team that was 6 & 3, with Mountain division title implications on the line. Holy poop that was bad. For a city of more than 400,000 - an immediate area of more than 700,000 - and a 70 mile radius of millions...THAT is what I would call pathetic.
*Reported attendance (butts in seats) was 11,519
You wanna talk pathetic attendance?
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
- WestWYOPoke
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:35 am
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 8 times
As opposed to...?
Staying at 6? Disbanding?? Not sure what other options the MW had.
I guess we should have invited Texas and Oklahoma to join.
Staying at 6? Disbanding?? Not sure what other options the MW had.
I guess we should have invited Texas and Oklahoma to join.
-
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 5195
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:21 pm
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 129 times
Attendance is not why the MWC is irrelevant. Attendance is a symptom of why the MWC is irrelevant.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
TV marketability is the biggest factor and we don't have it. Our leaders need to start acknowledging this and playing the class warfare card. It seems to resonate right now. There is no more "un-American" system than the P5 mentality. "You aren't rich enough, prestigious enough, or have enough of a royal lineage (i.e. history) to be allowed to compete".
If you cut through the b.s., that is what they are telling us. For some reason we accept that as an acceptable reality. We should be hammering away at the message "We are only asking for the opportunity to compete. In today's society, now more than ever, our Universities should stand as beacon of hope and demonstrate that all have the opportunity to succeed with hard work. Not just the wealthy or those with history that is deemed more important than others."
- McPeachy
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 119 times
I don't know about that Beaver...BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
Makes me vomit that you think bWHYu and Utard are powerhouse programs though. I will give you TCU, but that stadium only holds 40K - and without the current run (Patterson), it wouldn't be filled at that. The gaps between relevant and irrelevant are continually widening. There are about 30 or so football programs that will survive the USA - NCAA Armageddon. Wyoming isn't one of those (neither is Oregon State by the way) - so we may as well call it what it is, and let the 30 or so slide off to become the NFLite, and the remaining 80 - 90 compete at a true and somewhat equal collegiate level.
Dear Karma,
I have a list of people you missed...
I have a list of people you missed...
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
This isn't football of yesteryear peach, no one cares about who wasn't good back then. The fact Utah has 2 BCS Bowl wins this century and is ranked in a P5 conference equates to powerhouse in the sense of haves versus have nots. Byu could have been a have but they decided to become a have not.McPeachy wrote:I don't know about that Beaver...BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
Makes me vomit that you think bWHYu and Utard are powerhouse programs though. I will give you TCU, but that stadium only holds 40K - and without the current run (Patterson), it wouldn't be filled at that. The gaps between relevant and irrelevant are continually widening. There are about 30 or so football programs that will survive the USA - NCAA Armageddon. Wyoming isn't one of those (neither is Oregon State by the way) - so we may as well call it what it is, and let the 30 or so slide off to become the NFLite, and the remaining 80 - 90 compete at a true and somewhat equal collegiate level.
It's not that there's 30 or so programs that are going to survive. It's p5 versus the rest.
that's why utah and tcu (and oregon state) are fine. Mwc? Nope.
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
- BackHarlowRoad
- A Real Cowboy
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:35 pm
- Location: Wyo
- Been liked: 4 times
I like WWP's question.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
What else would you have had MWC do? Inviting the better WAC schools was our only option.
- kansasCowboy
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:42 pm
Did we forget Eastern Mich? 30k stadium,'and they avg 3-4k a game.
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
BackHarlowRoad wrote:I like WWP's question.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
What else would you have had MWC do? Inviting the better WAC schools was our only option.
Nothing we could have done, it just cemented the MWC as a lower-tier conference.
I said that very tongue in cheek not bashing the MWC for doing it but more of a "Great! That's our only choice! So awesome!"
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
- Brew_Poke
- Cowpoke
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:13 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 2 times
UU was no powerhouse, neither was TCU. They both had perfect timing, and sort of lucked out. TCU was good 50 years ago, when Wyoming was good, then got good again under Patterson. Utah was good after the Olympics resulted in expanding their stadium, and they fired McBride and hired Urban Legend.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
BYU has had the attendance and support and winning to be considered a 'major' or powerhouse for 35 years.
- McPeachy
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 119 times
Worst part is, Dickface still couldn't compete in the "watered down" MWC. That piece of poop.BeaverPoke wrote:Nothing we could have done, it just cemented the MWC as a lower-tier conference.
I said that very tongue in cheek not bashing the MWC for doing it but more of a "Great! That's our only choice! So awesome!"
Dear Karma,
I have a list of people you missed...
I have a list of people you missed...
- johnywyo
- Ranch Hand
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:58 am
- Location: Big 10 Country
- Been liked: 1 time
Lets just start a THREAD: BEAVERS BITCH ZONE
That way I can avoid reading all this insidious bull poop.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing gratifying about his observations anymore.
Closed case.
That way I can avoid reading all this insidious bull poop.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing gratifying about his observations anymore.
Closed case.
At the molecular level all mankind is a brilliant super-nova.
-
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:28 pm
- Location: Wherever I'm At
- Has liked: 13 times
- Been liked: 16 times
As of right now, good chance TCU is in the playoff.Brew_Poke wrote:UU was no powerhouse, neither was TCU. They both had perfect timing, and sort of lucked out. TCU was good 50 years ago, when Wyoming was good, then got good again under Patterson. Utah was good after the Olympics resulted in expanding their stadium, and they fired McBride and hired Urban Legend.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
BYU has had the attendance and support and winning to be considered a 'major' or powerhouse for 35 years.
"WE are the music makers and WE are the dreamers of the dreams." -Willy Wonka (Gene Wilder) Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
- fromolwyoming
- WyoNation Lifer
- Posts: 12832
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:13 pm
- Location: Laramie, Home of the Cowboys
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 2 times
TCU's problems the last couple of years was severe lack of depth and experience. They had something like 20 players kicked out due to testing positive for drugs. A lot of them on the 1 and 2 deep. This year is more like the TCU teams before that happened.Wyovanian wrote:As of right now, good chance TCU is in the playoff.Brew_Poke wrote:UU was no powerhouse, neither was TCU. They both had perfect timing, and sort of lucked out. TCU was good 50 years ago, when Wyoming was good, then got good again under Patterson. Utah was good after the Olympics resulted in expanding their stadium, and they fired McBride and hired Urban Legend.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
BYU has had the attendance and support and winning to be considered a 'major' or powerhouse for 35 years.
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
Hey dingus, I didn't even start this thread. Just threw in my opinion. And the beauty of forums is that if you don't want to read my posts, don't come to Wyonation. You know I am going to be here commenting.johnywyo wrote:Lets just start a THREAD: BEAVERS BITCH ZONE
That way I can avoid reading all this insidious bull poop.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing gratifying about his observations anymore.
Closed case.
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
- Brew_Poke
- Cowpoke
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:13 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 2 times
Yes, they got good under Patterson, as I stated.Wyovanian wrote:As of right now, good chance TCU is in the playoff.Brew_Poke wrote:UU was no powerhouse, neither was TCU. They both had perfect timing, and sort of lucked out. TCU was good 50 years ago, when Wyoming was good, then got good again under Patterson. Utah was good after the Olympics resulted in expanding their stadium, and they fired McBride and hired Urban Legend.BeaverPoke wrote:This is why the MWC is irrelevant. I was going to say "becoming irrelevant" but let's not kid ourselves, the process is done and we are irrelevant now.
Thank goodness we brought in a bunch of WAC programs to replace 3 powerhouse programs.
BYU has had the attendance and support and winning to be considered a 'major' or powerhouse for 35 years.
-
- Cowpoke
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:57 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 1 time
ive been pounding the NDSU TO FBS drums for 2-3 years now, but the distractors all point to MAC & MWC actual attendences and say "why would NDSU leave a 20,000 seat packed stadium every weekend"
I hope that attendence will start to rise again in the MWC/MAC
I hope that attendence will start to rise again in the MWC/MAC