Looking at the MWC, and specifically back to the Glenn & Staff era, I can't help but really wonder if Wyoming would have been better off right now (or pre - Bohl) having kept Glenn and never hiring Dickface.
A couple interesting looks:
2003 4-8 Joe Glenn
2004 7-5 Joe Glenn Las Vegas Bowl champions
2005 4-7 Joe Glenn
2006 6-6 Joe Glenn
2007 5-7 Joe Glenn
2008 4-8 Joe Glenn - 2 close losses to end the season (UNLV / CSU)
2011 Utah no longer a MWC member
2011 BYU no longer a MWC member
2012 TCU no longer a MWC member
2009 7-6 Dave Christensen New Mexico Bowl champions
2010 3-9 Dave Christensen
2011 8-5 Dave Christensen Throttled in New Mexico Bowl (didn't play BYU or Utah) DF looks at Houston Job
2012 4-8 Dave Christensen (didn't play TCU - MWC very watered down now)
2013 5-7 Dave Christensen
Glenn & Staff Would Have Competed!?
- fromolwyoming
- WyoNation Lifer
- Posts: 12832
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:13 pm
- Location: Laramie, Home of the Cowboys
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 2 times
The one thing DC had over Glenn was that he could at least get decent offensive players in here, and luck out on the occasional defensive player as well. But he could not develop ANY of his players. Glenn, at least on the defensive side, had a lot of hard nosed players. Just the ineptitude of the offense to do anything is what ultimately doomed him. "Thunder and Lightning" were good, but otherwise, yeah.
-
- A Real Cowboy
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:07 pm
- Been liked: 6 times
I posted this a while back, but here are the Sagarin averages (encompassing SOS) for our last few coaches:
DC: 106
JG: 82
Vic: 134
Bohl's first year: 115
It's hard to say how Glenn would have competed because his last team was 122nd in the Sagarin rankings. That was a pretty bad team that won some close games (21-20 over Ohio, 16-13 against NDSU, 13-7 against Tennessee), so the trajectory was not good. However, Glenn clearly had the best overall teams of any coach this century. Sad, but true.
I actually think if we would have invested a little more in that relationship it would have worked out. We blame Glenn's loyalty to Cockhill, but if he had a larger budget for assistants he might have been able to upgrade that spot sooner (by the time the switch occurred JG was a lame duck so he had almost no options, hence the Bob Cole experience). Glenn was a nice fit at UW in a number of ways, and was simply undone by poor offensive coaching and the inability to recruit on that side of the ball.
It could be worse, we could be UNLV. 2 wins in 8 of the last 11 years (seriously) and they are hiring a HS coach now.
DC: 106
JG: 82
Vic: 134
Bohl's first year: 115
It's hard to say how Glenn would have competed because his last team was 122nd in the Sagarin rankings. That was a pretty bad team that won some close games (21-20 over Ohio, 16-13 against NDSU, 13-7 against Tennessee), so the trajectory was not good. However, Glenn clearly had the best overall teams of any coach this century. Sad, but true.
I actually think if we would have invested a little more in that relationship it would have worked out. We blame Glenn's loyalty to Cockhill, but if he had a larger budget for assistants he might have been able to upgrade that spot sooner (by the time the switch occurred JG was a lame duck so he had almost no options, hence the Bob Cole experience). Glenn was a nice fit at UW in a number of ways, and was simply undone by poor offensive coaching and the inability to recruit on that side of the ball.
It could be worse, we could be UNLV. 2 wins in 8 of the last 11 years (seriously) and they are hiring a HS coach now.
- McPeachy
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 119 times
As Nowhere mentioned above - I think the offense was obviously Glenn's Achilles. And it very easily could have come down to pay for assistants and support from the administration. Glenn was (obviously) a believer in defense first. But, think about the $$ tossed at Dickface...if that would have been given to Glenn, with an extension / premise of hiring an offensive mind, things would certainly be different.fromolwyoming wrote:The one thing DC had over Glenn was that he could at least get decent offensive players in here, and luck out on the occasional defensive player as well. But he could not develop ANY of his players. Glenn, at least on the defensive side, had a lot of hard nosed players. Just the ineptitude of the offense to do anything is what ultimately doomed him. "Thunder and Lightning" were good, but otherwise, yeah.
Dear Karma,
I have a list of people you missed...
I have a list of people you missed...
- fromolwyoming
- WyoNation Lifer
- Posts: 12832
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:13 pm
- Location: Laramie, Home of the Cowboys
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 2 times
True, but it is a bit late for this sort of speculation. Sad, but true. Glenn was a great guy and very personable. But now we have Bohl, who built NDSU into a juggernaut. It wasn't with a flashy offense, but with a smash mouth offense and defense. He brings a similar style that Glenn did, but with a seemingly better resume. And so far his recruits are doing pretty well, with Hill stepping it up after Wick went down and blowing all our minds, and Ryan Cummings stepping in at LT as a true freshmen and doing a pretty good job, considering true freshmen rarely start as linemen anywhere.McPeachy wrote:As Nowhere mentioned above - I think the offense was obviously Glenn's Achilles. And it very easily could have come down to pay for assistants and support from the administration. Glenn was (obviously) a believer in defense first. But, think about the $$ tossed at Dickface...if that would have been given to Glenn, with an extension / premise of hiring an offensive mind, things would certainly be different.fromolwyoming wrote:The one thing DC had over Glenn was that he could at least get decent offensive players in here, and luck out on the occasional defensive player as well. But he could not develop ANY of his players. Glenn, at least on the defensive side, had a lot of hard nosed players. Just the ineptitude of the offense to do anything is what ultimately doomed him. "Thunder and Lightning" were good, but otherwise, yeah.
-
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 5195
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:21 pm
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 129 times
In hindsight, this and the Schroyer hire should have been fatal for Burman. JG was a unique individual that fit WYO well.
I too wonder what would have happened with an AD with vision who threw money in for assistants and stuck with JG?
Instead, Burman went on a tangent about how downhill, hard-nosed football wouldn't work at WYO. How we needed a unique system because we can't get recruits, blah, blah, blah. He hires DC to minimize the effects of how hard it is to recruit to Wyoming. Now, here we are back to hard-nosed football.
Clear lack of vision, mission, and plan.
I too wonder what would have happened with an AD with vision who threw money in for assistants and stuck with JG?
Instead, Burman went on a tangent about how downhill, hard-nosed football wouldn't work at WYO. How we needed a unique system because we can't get recruits, blah, blah, blah. He hires DC to minimize the effects of how hard it is to recruit to Wyoming. Now, here we are back to hard-nosed football.
Clear lack of vision, mission, and plan.
-
- Ranch Hand
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:21 pm
I purely enjoy the dynamic of "UW tolerates mediocrity but, my God, don't fire a coach who is mediocre."
Glenn had to go. He was overmatched. He was getting worse every year.
Though he was a truly nice and fun guy.
Glenn had to go. He was overmatched. He was getting worse every year.
Though he was a truly nice and fun guy.
-
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 5195
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:21 pm
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 129 times
Ironically, his steepest decline came immediately after Burman was hired.
And yet you are pro-BurmanSnowyRange wrote:I purely enjoy the dynamic of "UW tolerates mediocrity but, my God, don't fire a coach who is mediocre."
NowherePoke wrote:
I actually think if we would have invested a little more in that relationship it would have worked out. We blame Glenn's loyalty to Cockhill, but if he had a larger budget for assistants he might have been able to upgrade that spot sooner (by the time the switch occurred JG was a lame duck so he had almost no options, hence the Bob Cole experience). Glenn was a nice fit at UW in a number of ways, and was simply undone by poor offensive coaching and the inability to recruit on that side of the ball.
Maybe. Not only Cockhill but also Dr. Wisniewski the receivers coach/recruiting coordinator (in title only), Knutsen, Germer, Casey with little coaching experience. Maybe Glenn would have hired a better staff with more money, maybe he would have stuck with who he knew no matter what.
As SnowyRange pointed out, he was being outclassed as a coach. I don't forget the monumental blowouts that occurred under his tenure, year after year. Great, nice guy. But he had to go.
Also, at South Dakota he has surrounded himself with sons of friends and former local legends. Not a bad philosophy to be loyal and give valuable experience to those close to you. USD is 7-28 in three years under Glenn. I'm pretty sure his time at Montana was a fluke.
Gotdamned great guy though, no sarcasm. Stutzreim would have ran through a wall and then eaten it for the man, mucho sarcasmo.
- McPeachy
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Has liked: 306 times
- Been liked: 119 times
Sarcasm doesn't exist in that specific sentence though, right? I sure hope not. As he was a great guy - and Stutz would have run through a wall, etc., for Glenn & Company.hithere wrote:Gotdamned great guy though, no sarcasm. Stutzreim would have ran through a wall and then eaten it for the man, mucho sarcasmo.
Oh, and Germer was solid...but you are spot on with the others. Especially Cockmaster and Knutson.
Dear Karma,
I have a list of people you missed...
I have a list of people you missed...
I think this what if scenario does have some interesting features:
1.) Joe Glenn didn't make much money at wyo. His salary was at $450k after incentives if I remember right.
2.) Asumming Glenn would have went for it, he could have kept his salary cap. The amount of money UW came up with for DC and his assistants would have went a long, long, long ways into bringing some high quality assistants into Laramie.
I don't know what the assitants make these days, but if you could get the head coach to take less and put more in the pool for the assistants - you may be able to keep them around. HC = $450k, OC/DC=$450k, position coaches in the 200k range. JG seemed like the kind of guy that may have went for this idea....
who knows .....
1.) Joe Glenn didn't make much money at wyo. His salary was at $450k after incentives if I remember right.
2.) Asumming Glenn would have went for it, he could have kept his salary cap. The amount of money UW came up with for DC and his assistants would have went a long, long, long ways into bringing some high quality assistants into Laramie.
I don't know what the assitants make these days, but if you could get the head coach to take less and put more in the pool for the assistants - you may be able to keep them around. HC = $450k, OC/DC=$450k, position coaches in the 200k range. JG seemed like the kind of guy that may have went for this idea....
who knows .....
- WestWYOPoke
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:35 am
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 8 times
$450 K would be a lot for a coordinator at this level, and 200K, while not as far off, is still pretty generous for a position coach. That would certainly attract some quality candidates if we paid that much (except for only $450K for a head coach).
I would have ran through a wall for Glenn! I loved him from 2003-November 17th 2007.McPeachy wrote:
Sarcasm doesn't exist in that specific sentence though, right? I sure hope not. As he was a great guy - and Stutz would have run through a wall, etc., for Glenn & Company.
Oh, and Germer was solid...but you are spot on with the others. Especially Cockmaster and Knutson.
Just making a fat joke at Stutz's expense. He was portly.
The 2006 team was I think the best team we've had this century probably. They were a couple of early season heartbreaks from a potential 9-3, 10-2 type campaign blowing out Utah and CSU along the way.
I do think that while Glenn's defenses were better than what we have had since he left, people remember them a little too fondly than what they actually were. Glenn simply got blown out way too many times against MW teams, and his "good" defenses never stopped anyone really with a pulse. Even that pretty good 2006 team got absolutely crushed by BYU. Glenn presents some interesting what ifs, but then again the history of Wyoming athletics is filled with a bunch of what ifs.
I do think that while Glenn's defenses were better than what we have had since he left, people remember them a little too fondly than what they actually were. Glenn simply got blown out way too many times against MW teams, and his "good" defenses never stopped anyone really with a pulse. Even that pretty good 2006 team got absolutely crushed by BYU. Glenn presents some interesting what ifs, but then again the history of Wyoming athletics is filled with a bunch of what ifs.
- Brew_Poke
- Cowpoke
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:13 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 2 times
Joe Glenn was the only coach in the MWC to have beaten every other team at least once.McPeachy wrote:Looking at the MWC, and specifically back to the Glenn & Staff era, I can't help but really wonder if Wyoming would have been better off right now (or pre - Bohl) having kept Glenn and never hiring Dickface.
A couple interesting looks:
2003 4-8 Joe Glenn
2004 7-5 Joe Glenn Las Vegas Bowl champions
2005 4-7 Joe Glenn
2006 6-6 Joe Glenn
2007 5-7 Joe Glenn
2008 4-8 Joe Glenn - 2 close losses to end the season (UNLV / CSU)
2011 Utah no longer a MWC member
2011 BYU no longer a MWC member
2012 TCU no longer a MWC member
2009 7-6 Dave Christensen New Mexico Bowl champions
2010 3-9 Dave Christensen
2011 8-5 Dave Christensen Throttled in New Mexico Bowl (didn't play BYU or Utah) DF looks at Houston Job
2012 4-8 Dave Christensen (didn't play TCU - MWC very watered down now)
2013 5-7 Dave Christensen
- BeaverPoke
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:00 pm
- Location: Corvallis, Oregon
DC and Brett Smith would have competed.
Montana? Check.
AFA? Check.
FAU? Check.
Oregon? Nope.
Michigan State? Nope.
NM? Check.
SJSU? Check.
Hawaii? Check.
Fresno? Check.
CSU? Nope.
Boise? Nope.
Utah State? Nope.
DC would have gone 7-5.
Montana? Check.
AFA? Check.
FAU? Check.
Oregon? Nope.
Michigan State? Nope.
NM? Check.
SJSU? Check.
Hawaii? Check.
Fresno? Check.
CSU? Nope.
Boise? Nope.
Utah State? Nope.
DC would have gone 7-5.
If you ever need to laugh, just remember there was some idiot who wanted Bohl fired after 2 seasons.
- LanderPoke
- WyoNation Lifer
- Posts: 11178
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:47 pm
- Location: Laramie
- Has liked: 597 times
- Been liked: 238 times
Bohl + Brett Smith would have gone 8-4. .BeaverPoke wrote:DC and Brett Smith would have competed.
Montana? Check.
AFA? Check.
FAU? Check.
Oregon? Nope.
Michigan State? Nope.
NM? Check.
SJSU? Check.
Hawaii? Check.
Fresno? Check.
CSU? Nope.
Boise? Nope.
Utah State? Nope.
DC would have gone 7-5.
- djm19
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:34 pm
- Location: UT
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 3 times
The fact that we are even considering 2006 the best team shows what a sad state our football program is in. When Karsten Sween QB'ed your "best team of the century"calpoke25 wrote:The 2006 team was I think the best team we've had this century probably. They were a couple of early season heartbreaks from a potential 9-3, 10-2 type campaign blowing out Utah and CSU along the way.
I do think that while Glenn's defenses were better than what we have had since he left, people remember them a little too fondly than what they actually were. Glenn simply got blown out way too many times against MW teams, and his "good" defenses never stopped anyone really with a pulse. Even that pretty good 2006 team got absolutely crushed by BYU. Glenn presents some interesting what ifs, but then again the history of Wyoming athletics is filled with a bunch of what ifs.
-
- Bronco-Buster
- Posts: 5195
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:21 pm
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 129 times
Honestly, our D was so bad that I don't think any or at least very few games would be gimmies regardless of coach and/or QB.
-
- WyoNation Addict
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:25 pm
I'm not sure of the year, but IMO our best team was when Corey Bramlett was QB (could have been 2006A). The game against TCU where we turned the ball over 7 times was the turning point in the Joe Glenn era. Win that game and the Pokes had some traction. We lost a close one despite of al the turnovers. However, the turnovers just kept coming after that. The offense was never able to recover and progressively got worse. The defense did as well.djm19 wrote:The fact that we are even considering 2006 the best team shows what a sad state our football program is in. When Karsten Sween QB'ed your "best team of the century"calpoke25 wrote:The 2006 team was I think the best team we've had this century probably. They were a couple of early season heartbreaks from a potential 9-3, 10-2 type campaign blowing out Utah and CSU along the way.
I do think that while Glenn's defenses were better than what we have had since he left, people remember them a little too fondly than what they actually were. Glenn simply got blown out way too many times against MW teams, and his "good" defenses never stopped anyone really with a pulse. Even that pretty good 2006 team got absolutely crushed by BYU. Glenn presents some interesting what ifs, but then again the history of Wyoming athletics is filled with a bunch of what ifs.