Random thoughts on the 2nd Coastal Carolina game

Everything Cowboy and Cowgirl Basketball, plus other Cowboy athletics
Post Reply
.44caliberkiller
Blog Team
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:21 pm

1. Home sweet home. The truth of the matter and unsurprising to no one is the fact we're a completely different team when at home. At the dome of doom were a robust 18-3, but on the road or on a neutral court were a measly 4-12. Next year along with protecting our home court we need to take the next big step and be a vastly improved team on the road.

2. The first half was very sluggish and although Wyoming had a 33-27 halftime lead both teams should have been disappointed they weren't leading by double digits. Wyoming should have been disappointed because they were playing on their home court and they held the opposing team to 28.7% shooting from the field, 15% shooting from the arc, and 50% shooting from the free throw line. Playing at home and holding the opposing team to such a low shooting have they should have easily been up by double digits. Coastal Carolina should have been disappointed they didn't have a double digit lead after the first half because at the midway point they again were dominating us on the offensive glass as well as forcing droves of turnovers, 10 to be exact. You force that many turnovers and get than many more shots than the opposing team (12) in a half you should have a double digit lead. Possibly the reason for such a sluggish half was because both teams struggled with the quick turn around and travel from Conway South Carolina to Laramie Wyoming the Cowboys.

3. Rebounding was again an issue, but unlike in game one we were able to limit the damage. Coastal Carolina had 18 offensive rebounds and only 11 in game two. While 11 offensive rebounds is still a little too many to give up, it's considerable better than 18. And unlike in game one we were able to keep them from scoring many second chance points. The overall rebounding total is certainly misleading. In the box score it will read that Wyoming won the rebounding battle 45-36. However it should be noted that Coastal Carolina attempted 12 more shots than us and made 4 fewer baskets, giving Wyoming considerable more opportunities to get rebounds. In game three Wyoming needs to continue to increase their efforts on the glass.

4. Turnovers plagued us again, much like they have throughout the entire season. As I noted earlier our 10 turnovers in the first half were a major reason this game wasn't a complete run away from start to finish. But on a positive note we only had 5 turnovers in the second half. It has been my belief that if we can limit our turnovers to around 10 per game at the pace we play we're in good shape. So it was no coincidence that in the second half where we only had 5 turnovers we outscored Coastal Carolina 48-30. If we lose in game three I believe rebounding and turnovers will be the catalyst that leads to our demise.

5. Edwards starting Barnes was a good decision. If you would have asked me before the game I would have said we should start either Naughton or Dalton in place of Moemeka. But Edwards again went to the the much maligned Barnes for the start, and it paid dividends. Looking at the box score would give you no indication that Barnes was any factor in the game what so ever. But watching the game you could clearly see that his hustle and size down low lead to multiple second chance opportunities which helped set the tone for what turned out to be a wire to wire victory.

6. Gorski was used to perfection in this game. Obviously it is easy to say that in hindsight after seeing him score 17pts and hit 5 three's, most if not all game in the second half. But this is how a player of Gorski's skill level (streaky shooter/limited athletically) should be used. Give him a few minutes here and there and if he's having an off shooting night play him sparingly, but if he's stroking it like he was against Coastal Carolina ride him until he drops.

7. It was good to see James get back to playing like the budding star he is, as opposed to the horrific game he had in game one. While he still has a tendency to turn the ball over too much, these are the kind of performance's we have been getting used to from him. He was 8/13 from the field, shot 40% from the arc, was perfect from the stripe, collected 8 rebounds, and chipped in 3asst/1stl/2blk. That's a solid nights work and this team is obviously better when he is starting and playing up to his high capabilities.

8. Herndon only had 8pts but I thought he was a force to be reckoned with down low. He blocked another 2 shots, but it was his effort on rebounding that really excited and impressed me. Herndon took a page out of Dalton's book and aggressively attacked the glass instead of being a reactionary rebounder like he normally is. I've always been a Herndon supporter and I think he catches a lot of unfair criticism because he's not the traditional "big" that people have come to expect.
But a game like this proves he can be a plus rebounder if he plays with the proper demeanor. Hopefully next year he finds it in himself to bring that type of intensity every night.

9. Dalton although struggling with his shot (1/8fg) had a pretty solid game. It was good to see that his shot being off didn't affect the rest of his game. He had several nice passes that lead to dunks, was effective on the glass, and added 2 blocks. These are the types of performances that are the difference between winning and losing, because on a night when your not shooting well you need to find other ways to positively impact the game.

10. I thought it is was a stand up move on Edwards part to address the crowd after the game and give his thanks for what was a good crowd, as well as to pay for the first 250 students to Friday's game. We have been very tough on Edwards this year and rightfully so to an extent. But it seems to me that he's learning and growing into the position. With this win or with a win on Friday I believe he enters the all-time top 5 for wins by a first year head coach in NCAA history.

11. There were only 3,800 people in attendance but it felt more like 10,000. It sure is nice having our fans all sitting together in the lower bowl as opposed to spread out throughout the whole arena. I know this topic has been touched on several times, and I don't have the solution to the problem but it makes for a much better game day experience and I hope it's something that is looked into moving forward. It would be nice if we could pack more people into the AA for the final game but I fear the weather and a 5pm tip-off time will limit our numbers. The town of Laramie and the students need to step up.
User avatar
ZapPoke
Cowpoke
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:38 am
Location: Casper Wyoming
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 40 times

Once again, good points.
User avatar
ItSucksToBeACSURam
WyoNation Addict
Posts: 4683
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:53 pm

.44caliberkiller wrote: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:31 am 1. Home sweet home. The truth of the matter and unsurprising to no one is the fact we're a completely different team when at home. At the dome of doom were a robust 18-3, but on the road or on a neutral court were a measly 4-12. Next year along with protecting our home court we need to take the next big step and be a vastly improved team on the road.

2. The first half was very sluggish and although Wyoming had a 33-27 halftime lead both teams should have been disappointed they weren't leading by double digits. Wyoming should have been disappointed because they were playing on their home court and they held the opposing team to 28.7% shooting from the field, 15% shooting from the arc, and 50% shooting from the free throw line. Playing at home and holding the opposing team to such a low shooting have they should have easily been up by double digits. Coastal Carolina should have been disappointed they didn't have a double digit lead after the first half because at the midway point they again were dominating us on the offensive glass as well as forcing droves of turnovers, 10 to be exact. You force that many turnovers and get than many more shots than the opposing team (12) in a half you should have a double digit lead. Possibly the reason for such a sluggish half was because both teams struggled with the quick turn around and travel from Conway South Carolina to Laramie Wyoming the Cowboys.

3. Rebounding was again an issue, but unlike in game one we were able to limit the damage. Coastal Carolina had 18 offensive rebounds and only 11 in game two. While 11 offensive rebounds is still a little too many to give up, it's considerable better than 18. And unlike in game one we were able to keep them from scoring many second chance points. The overall rebounding total is certainly misleading. In the box score it will read that Wyoming won the rebounding battle 45-36. However it should be noted that Coastal Carolina attempted 12 more shots than us and made 4 fewer baskets, giving Wyoming considerable more opportunities to get rebounds. In game three Wyoming needs to continue to increase their efforts on the glass.

4. Turnovers plagued us again, much like they have throughout the entire season. As I noted earlier our 10 turnovers in the first half were a major reason this game wasn't a complete run away from start to finish. But on a positive note we only had 5 turnovers in the second half. It has been my belief that if we can limit our turnovers to around 10 per game at the pace we play we're in good shape. So it was no coincidence that in the second half where we only had 5 turnovers we outscored Coastal Carolina 48-30. If we lose in game three I believe rebounding and turnovers will be the catalyst that leads to our demise.

5. Edwards starting Barnes was a good decision. If you would have asked me before the game I would have said we should start either Naughton or Dalton in place of Moemeka. But Edwards again went to the the much maligned Barnes for the start, and it paid dividends. Looking at the box score would give you no indication that Barnes was any factor in the game what so ever. But watching the game you could clearly see that his hustle and size down low lead to multiple second chance opportunities which helped set the tone for what turned out to be a wire to wire victory.

6. Gorski was used to perfection in this game. Obviously it is easy to say that in hindsight after seeing him score 17pts and hit 5 three's, most if not all game in the second half. But this is how a player of Gorski's skill level (streaky shooter/limited athletically) should be used. Give him a few minutes here and there and if he's having an off shooting night play him sparingly, but if he's stroking it like he was against Coastal Carolina ride him until he drops.

7. It was good to see James get back to playing like the budding star he is, as opposed to the horrific game he had in game one. While he still has a tendency to turn the ball over too much, these are the kind of performance's we have been getting used to from him. He was 8/13 from the field, shot 40% from the arc, was perfect from the stripe, collected 8 rebounds, and chipped in 3asst/1stl/2blk. That's a solid nights work and this team is obviously better when he is starting and playing up to his high capabilities.

8. Herndon only had 8pts but I thought he was a force to be reckoned with down low. He blocked another 2 shots, but it was his effort on rebounding that really excited and impressed me. Herndon took a page out of Dalton's book and aggressively attacked the glass instead of being a reactionary rebounder like he normally is. I've always been a Herndon supporter and I think he catches a lot of unfair criticism because he's not the traditional "big" that people have come to expect.
But a game like this proves he can be a plus rebounder if he plays with the proper demeanor. Hopefully next year he finds it in himself to bring that type of intensity every night.

9. Dalton although struggling with his shot (1/8fg) had a pretty solid game. It was good to see that his shot being off didn't affect the rest of his game. He had several nice passes that lead to dunks, was effective on the glass, and added 2 blocks. These are the types of performances that are the difference between winning and losing, because on a night when your not shooting well you need to find other ways to positively impact the game.

10. I thought it is was a stand up move on Edwards part to address the crowd after the game and give his thanks for what was a good crowd, as well as to pay for the first 250 students to Friday's game. We have been very tough on Edwards this year and rightfully so to an extent. But it seems to me that he's learning and growing into the position. With this win or with a win on Friday I believe he enters the all-time top 5 for wins by a first year head coach in NCAA history.

11. There were only 3,800 people in attendance but it felt more like 10,000. It sure is nice having our fans all sitting together in the lower bowl as opposed to spread out throughout the whole arena. I know this topic has been touched on several times, and I don't have the solution to the problem but it makes for a much better game day experience and I hope it's something that is looked into moving forward. It would be nice if we could pack more people into the AA for the final game but I fear the weather and a 5pm tip-off time will limit our numbers. The town of Laramie and the students need to step up.
5. You would never know it looking at the stats but I think this was Barnes best career game as a cowboy. He was hustling all over the court making "hustle plays" which led to opportunities for his teammates. He truly had a great game.

10. There has been a noticeable difference with this team since the CBI started and it has started from Edwards. His demeanor seems different and we're starting to see him make decisions based off of information he's learned this season instead of his preconceived notions. He's limiting playing minutes to those not deserving and is riding the hot hand when needed. He seems to be coaching with an eye to the future and the future looks much brighter than this season played out. I still hate his sideline antics and interactions with players but I can see his coaching personality coming through and it could be good for Wyoming.



A couple things stood out to me about the game.

CCU is a team of good athletes playing basketballl instead of a team of good basketball players who are athletes. It obvious that we outclassed them last night and if we can take care of the basketball, limit turnovers, hit the boards hard, and keep the fouls in check and we will run away with the championship on Friday. It's weird to say, but we truly are the best team of the two definitely and are probably the best team in this tournament. It's time to go prove it.

In sparse minutes, Naughton made a big impact. I loved hearing the story about Edwards challenging him to go earn the minutes they took from him. Get hungry big man! He played like a dude who wants to win games. He was solid on D, got up for some rebounds, and played smart with the ball around he basket. AND THOSE DUNKS!

Beginning to wonder if Adams would be better suited in pads on saturdays. That dude has one move and it's lower his head and get to the hoop. There were a number of times last night where the refs bailed him out. He needs to improve his decisions for next season.

JMac shot well last night. It's great seeing him go out playing well and hopefully he'll get to be part of one more banner ceremony.

The core of Herndon, JJ, Dalton, and Liebs look great right now. Hopefully this bodes well for next season. I think we're gaining more than we're losing for next season and believe we could take a huge step.

Can't wait for Friday, GO POKES!
Last edited by ItSucksToBeACSURam on Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
Image
stymeman
Bronco-Buster
Posts: 7214
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:40 pm
Location: Cheyenne, again
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 42 times

Step up Laramie, Please!!!
User avatar
wyoair
Ranch Hand
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:04 am
Location: Torrington, Wyoming

Good points everyone. I have super high hopes for Naughton and I hope this game gives him
The confidence to be more aggressive. Adams should watch tape on Russell Westbrook. They have similar game and desire. Russell is obviously more polished in his game and he likes to drive and penetrate but much more controlled.
CodyPoke
Ranch Hand
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:35 pm

Anyone know how it is decided which teams in the CBI tourney get to play most of their games at home?
User avatar
LanderPoke
WyoNation Lifer
Posts: 11160
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:47 pm
Location: Laramie
Has liked: 586 times
Been liked: 236 times

Adams needs some hesitation dribbles, pump fakes, pull up jumpers etc.. Lou could be unstoppable if he would just mix it up a bit, I still think he needs to be out there 25+ minutes.

Herndon played a lot tougher.

Having everyone close to the court makes for a much better atmosphere.

Cody Kelly >Lieberman
stymeman
Bronco-Buster
Posts: 7214
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:40 pm
Location: Cheyenne, again
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 42 times

CodyPoke wrote: Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:46 am Anyone know how it is decided which teams in the CBI tourney get to play most of their games at home?
I've heard who ponies up the $ to do so and the arena that will allow for more fans, but I could be wrong, our investment should pay off well for experience next year I think
Subcanis
A Real Cowboy
Posts: 1530
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:43 am

I didn't get to actually watch a whole lot of the game as I had a 6 and 3 year old in tow, but that pass from Dalton to Naughton for a dunk was SICK.

First basketball game for the kiddos. They had a blast and got foam fingers and hotdogs, so they're hooked. ;)
"I never saw a buckin' hoss to top Steamboat. Fact is, he was the closest thing to perpetual motion that ever wore hair. Few men could stand that kind of battering without bleeding from the nose, and most became nauseated as well. Ol' Steamboat put some of the toughest into the hospital for repairs."
Post Reply