Bohl interviewed for Iowa State

Sat Dec 05, 2015 4:06 pm

Dino you back on Sirius??

Sat Dec 05, 2015 4:55 pm

Cuttslam wrote:Dino you back on Sirius??

Sat Dec 05, 2015 5:46 pm

BackHarlowRoad wrote:Best way to handle people like Dino is to not read their long posts.

Sat Dec 05, 2015 7:09 pm

Cuttslam wrote:Dino you back on Sirius??

No, sir. I've been doing my online (subscription based) show that started just 3 weeks ago, and I've also been doing shows with Yahoo Sports Radio of late.

Sat Dec 05, 2015 7:30 pm

Yabadabadoo wrote:
Cuttslam wrote:Dino you back on Sirius??
No, sir. I've been doing my online (subscription based) show that started just 3 weeks ago, and I've also been doing shows with Yahoo Sports Radio of late.

Obvious troll not so obvious?

Sat Dec 05, 2015 10:59 pm

BeaverPoke wrote:That took effort and real commitment. Solid work navian.

Actually it took me all of five minutes...

Sun Dec 06, 2015 11:18 pm

Cornpoke wrote:If Bohl didn't actually interview for Iowa st. Then lock this thread and stop giving Beaver the pleasure of trying to start poop. I have a feeling he does this on more than just Wyonation. Trolls like him go all over other teams forums and try to stir the pot.

Let's not give this Oregon state fan the pleasure of that. I'd prefer this site to be for REAL Wyoming fans.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:35 am

If Bohl can't make .500 by year four he better not be the only one gone.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:12 am

“Costa is unpredictable but clever. He’s compelling. An original – a mastermind.”

That long, very long, post was all about dino fawning over dino. He is all ego and when you take away that .......well there's not much left.

Wyoming must have some bad kharma to have him latch on to the program.

Sorry to be so negative but some times you gotta call'em how they are.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:20 am

Total rumor mill here

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:24 am

https://twitter.com/ryanholmgren/status ... 5414525952

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:30 am

MrTitleist wrote:https://twitter.com/ryanholmgren/status ... 5414525952

Really no surprise here. The Iowa State AD was on record saying he wanted a "Mid-Western" smash mouth team with a heavy run offense.

I almost guarantee that the independent search committee came up with a list of names for the AD. I would bet Craig Bohl's name was on that list and that is likely as far as it got. I would guess their AD never considered Craig Bohl and thus was not even on Craig Bohl's radar either.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:41 am

They probably considered hiring Craig Bohl like I considered dating Jessica Alba.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:00 am

MrTitleist wrote:They probably considered hiring Craig Bohl like I considered dating Jessica Alba.

They probably considered hiring Craig Bohl like I considered dating Roseanne Barr circa 1990.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:07 am

MrTitleist wrote:They probably considered hiring Craig Bohl like I considered dating Jessica Alba.

More like you considering dating Caitlyn Jenner. I mean, theoretically it can happen, but as soon as his name is brought up you immediately know that you have much better options.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:16 am

So with all that being said, I feel more comfortable with Bohl.
Also, why would that reporter guy just tweet that?

Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:14 pm

cali2wyo wrote:
MrTitleist wrote:They probably considered hiring Craig Bohl like I considered dating Jessica Alba.
More like you considering dating Caitlyn Jenner. I mean, theoretically it can happen, but as soon as his name is brought up you immediately know that you have much better options.

That's what I thought about Jessica. "I have better options."

BeaverPoke wrote:So with all that being said, I feel more comfortable with Bohl.
Also, why would that reporter guy just tweet that?

Probably because people have been hammering him, "ZOMG IS CRAIG BOLL LEAVING? PLZ RESPOND!!" Or something.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:05 pm

BeaverPoke wrote:So with all that being said, I feel more comfortable with Bohl.
Also, why would that reporter guy just tweet that?

Because it's twitter and people can say whatever they want??

The real question is why did you take 1 tweet and run with it, questioning everything surrounding the context of it, instead of questioning it's validity.

"Because it's a message board and I can say whatever I want." Good point, but sometimes taking a step back and letting the dust settle is good too.

Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:13 pm

WestWYOPoke wrote:
BeaverPoke wrote:So with all that being said, I feel more comfortable with Bohl.
Also, why would that reporter guy just tweet that?
Because it's twitter and people can say whatever they want??

The real question is why did you take 1 tweet and run with it, questioning everything surrounding the context of it, instead of questioning it's validity.

"Because it's a message board and I can say whatever I want." Good point, but sometimes taking a step back and letting the dust settle is good too.

Zero accountability when you can attribute it to "sources"

Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:16 pm

WestWYOPoke wrote:
BeaverPoke wrote:So with all that being said, I feel more comfortable with Bohl.
Also, why would that reporter guy just tweet that?
Because it's twitter and people can say whatever they want??

The real question is why did you take 1 tweet and run with it, questioning everything surrounding the context of it, instead of questioning it's validity.

"Because it's a message board and I can say whatever I want." Good point, but sometimes taking a step back and letting the dust settle is good too.

Wait, you're getting on me, a FAN on a INTERNET MESSAGE BOARD for jumping the gun, but not the reporter who blatantly lied and/or was wrong?

The internet fan should be held to a higher standard than the reporter whose job it is to report the truth?
Am I the first fan to jump the gun on here? Nope. Have I done it before? Yep.
But I am not the reporter who didn't do his job.