Personally I think that MSU is closer to being ready for a move than UM regardless of stadium size (UM is larger) or football success (MSU has closed that gap in recent years). The main reason is the astronomical expansion of the University itself. Major projects including an 50+ million dollars for an Engineering building and 20+ Million for a Business building. Also the MSU College of Nursing just got 101 Million for expansion of the nursing program, which runs on all campuses in Montana, including UM-Missoula. In the past, the regents were pretty solid about the idea that moving up would be both UM and MSU or nothing.LanderPoke wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:59 amHow does Montana and Montana State feel about moving up and being in the MWC? I'd be in favor. Would love to be conference mates with the Montana schools in the big boy league, of course.Rich K wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:45 am This was posted over on the Montana State board. These guys have obviously thought about this a great deal. Towards the end they talk more about the FCS ramifications then you guys are probably interested in but the first part of it they do a pretty good dive into the FBS realignment.
That being said, I think that the BOR would be less likely to hold to the both or none thinking as MSU is rolling and UM is stagnant. UM has not had any significant growth in most of a decade.
I've generally been of the line of thought to stay FCS mainly because I like the tournament and that I didn't think MSU was ready. We also all had front row seats on Idaho's FBS circus and I didn't want to see a repeat of that failure. My mind has been slowly changing.
My bottom line today: The conference would have to be the MWC and it would be just MSU. Any conference less than MWC would be wrong (region and peer institutes). UM is not ready and dragging them along would be bad for them and the new conference. UM would need to resolve some institutional issues first (their football is fine). Not sure the regents would agree though.