WyoNation.com

J-Rod wrote:

Adv8RU12 wrote: Yes, but would you agree that with Dave at the helm it probably would have been much worse?

He would have found more QBs, RBs, and WRs....but would have continued the same gig....bowl game when he's lucky, 3-9 the other three times he doesn't in that four years.

To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.

Peace,

JimmyDimes wrote: To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.

Peace,

Fair enough....either way, the only consistent with Dave is that he would have been inconsistent.

J-Rod wrote:

JimmyDimes wrote: To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.

Peace,

Fair enough....either way, the only consistent with Dave is that he would have been inconsistent.

Make that 2. He never made any adjustments, at all.

Adv8RU12 wrote:

McPeachy wrote: ... we may not see positive results in the W/L column for 3 or so years.

Yes, but would you agree that with Dave at the helm it probably would have been much worse?

Dave lost the team last year, so yes, it could be much worse. Dave de-motivated (sweet word I know) an entire group of young men...even an NFL caliber QB, WR, and CB. You have to be one giant asshole in order for that to happen.

WYO1016 wrote:

fromolwyoming wrote:And last year, before he went down for the season, May was competing neck and neck with Wick for the RB position.

I believe that May was the clear cut starter before he got hurt last season. Considering what we saw from Wick last season, May must be killing it.

Actually Stover was #1 after Spring. May was only ahead of Tapscott.

A lot of senior leadership, especially on defense (9 of 11 starters)