What are you watching?
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 1:41 pm
The snow storm cleared and service is back. Going to watch Utards
It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Definitely but, they have been doing this all season, and are sitting at 7-3 in the Pac...so...there's that.Wyo2dal wrote:It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Funny what a solid defense can do for you.BeaverPoke wrote:Definitely but, they have been doing this all season, and are sitting at 7-3 in the Pac...so...there's that.Wyo2dal wrote:It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Cornpoke wrote:Don't think I have ever watched an Ivy league game but the Harvard Yale game was a darn good one. Didn't realize the ivy league doesn't have replay... I thought they were D1?
This makes me happy.Asmodeanreborn wrote:Utah's having a tough time not giving away points with their offense now. 42-10. Ouch.
I'm not going to say they haven't played anyone because that would be a lie but the games they lost they lost because of the constant 3 and outs and the defense not being able to keep the offense in games and that is part of the price you pay with a hurry up spread.BeaverPoke wrote:Definitely but, they have been doing this all season, and are sitting at 7-3 in the Pac...so...there's that.Wyo2dal wrote:It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Agreed.Wyo2dal wrote:I'm not going to say they haven't played anyone because that would be a lie but the games they lost they lost because of the constant 3 and outs and the defense not being able to keep the offense in games and that is part of the price you pay with a hurry up spread.BeaverPoke wrote:Definitely but, they have been doing this all season, and are sitting at 7-3 in the Pac...so...there's that.Wyo2dal wrote:It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Utah doesn't really have a complete team, DC is a good OC if you just want a spread hurry up offense and you can't say he isn't he had success with it but you can't have a successful spread and compete with the big boys w/o top quality players. Utah needs a QB and 1-2 receivers and they will be a threat and I think they will get them while DC is still there.BeaverPoke wrote:Agreed.Wyo2dal wrote:I'm not going to say they haven't played anyone because that would be a lie but the games they lost they lost because of the constant 3 and outs and the defense not being able to keep the offense in games and that is part of the price you pay with a hurry up spread.BeaverPoke wrote:Definitely but, they have been doing this all season, and are sitting at 7-3 in the Pac...so...there's that.Wyo2dal wrote:It has this Déjà vu feeling to it, Can't quite put my finger on it.laxwyo wrote:4 straight 3 and outs for Utes. I've seen this offense before
Was all of DCs success due to his QB recruiting, and Pinkels system?
Or do you think when DC gets some of his guys in, and the Utes offensive players get used to him (5 different OCs in 5 seasons) they will have a good offense?
Also something else to consider...
DCs Mizzou teams ripped the Big 12 apart for seasons, which was known for having poop defenses. Now, he is in the Pac12 which does not have that reputation.
So I guess what I am getting at is...
Was DC successful at Mizzou because he is a great OC, because of Pinkel and QB recruiting, or because of terrible Big12 defenses?
He did he had a solid day, Just a lot of people don't think he is 5 star quality and I think he is easily.J-Rod wrote:Dee Hart had a pretty good day today though.
You say that as a Wyoming fan that has seem them on the field and rooted for them so you have ties to them. In a recruiting battle if a 4 star came on you wouldn't pick a 2-3 star over them and you know it. As it sits yes I love the RB's we have and I wouldn't trade them for Hart but in a recruiting battle if we had a shot at a 4 star you know you would be excited.LanderPoke wrote:I'll take Wick/Hill over Pee Fart.
True. That's a good point.Wyo2dal wrote:You say that as a Wyoming fan that has seem them on the field and rooted for them so you have ties to them. In a recruiting battle if a 4 star came on you wouldn't pick a 2-3 star over them and you know it. As it sits yes I love the RB's we have and I wouldn't trade them for Hart but in a recruiting battle if we had a shot at a 4 star you know you would be excited.LanderPoke wrote:I'll take Wick/Hill over Pee Fart.
This. Boise State fans are bad with that. For awhile there, everything was about the mystique of the program and their ability to turn nobodies into gold...but the moment they landed one of the best high school football players in the country, suddenly 4-Star/5-Star guys are a big deal. No doubt in my mind, if someone like Porter Gustin committed to Wyoming, this board would go cuckoo for cocoa puffs.Wyo2dal wrote: You say that as a Wyoming fan that has seem them on the field and rooted for them so you have ties to them. In a recruiting battle if a 4 star came on you wouldn't pick a 2-3 star over them and you know it. As it sits yes I love the RB's we have and I wouldn't trade them for Hart but in a recruiting battle if we had a shot at a 4 star you know you would be excited.